The Great Emu War: When the Australian government launched an assault, they found themselves outmaneuvered

It wasn’t the first time a war has taken the name of a creature.

In 1859, the Pig War broke out between the United States and Britain over the boundary running through Canada. A British infantryman had shot a pig that happened to be on American soil. Local American soldiers responded by gathering on the border and awaiting the next move from the British side. Eventually, it died down after the British side apologized, with the pig listed as the single casualty.

During the 1960s, Brazil and France also entered into conflict following a dispute over who claimed the right to hunt an area for lobsters. Nobody was hurt thankfully, but the dispute had its name: the Lobster War.

Fallow caused by emus, which cleared land. and additional water supplies, during 1932, prompting the cries for an Emu War.

The stakes, however, were raised considerably in the Land Down Under. In this case, war was declared against the emu itself.

It all began following the end of World War I, when the Australian government’s solution to the challenge of finding employment for soldiers returning home was to offer them money and land to grow wheat in the West. Subsequently, more than 5,000 veterans benefited from the action–or attempted to.

Unfortunately, the country was struggling through one drought season after another, and then came the Great Depression. Farmers in the West found they had to face one more unanticipated problem: a horde of around 20,000 indigenous emu birds.

Emu head and upper neck, Photo by William Warby – Flickr / CC-BY 2.0

The unique flightless birds originally thrived in central parts of Australia, but in search of water during the drought seasons, they had also moved to the West. To their own surprise, the migrating emus stumbled upon quite a treat: vast fields of wheat. At ease, the vast flocks tore down fences in order to feast in the fields. In particular, they ventured into marginal farming lands such as those around Chandler and Walgoolan.

Not only did emus ravish the farmer’s crops, the gaps they left in fences also invited the biggest Australian pest of all, the rabbit, to come calling.

Emu on a postage stamp of Australia issued 1942

The emu problem was so overwhelming that farmers traveled to Canberra and demanded help from the government. George Pearce, who served as Defense Minister at that point, readily agreed to send troops of soldiers in order to help take care of the birds, reasoning that the exercise would make great target practice for the troops. As for the farmers, they had to agree to provide food and accommodation for the soldiers, and also pay the costs for ammunition.

The “Great Emu War” was set to begin in October 1932. Military involvement was to be led by Major G.P.W. Meredith, who had served in the Royal Australian Artillery. His soldiers were armed with Lewis guns and light machines from World War I. At their disposal, 10,000 rounds of ammunition.

Heavy rainfall delayed the operation until November 2nd, when the troops were quickly deployed at multiple points with orders to tackle the emu hoard, which was now loosely roaming over a vast area. Some newspaper accounts said that soldiers wanted to collect emu skins so that their feathers could be used to produce some hats for light horsemen.

Sir George Pearce was later referred to in Parliament as the “Minister of the Emu War” by Senator James Dunn.

It soon became clear that everyone had grossly underestimated the emu. Despite considering a number of tactics, including trying to lure bigger groups of emus into an ambush, all attempts to shoot the birds had poor results.

The emus were so fast that they would quickly scatter in the wilderness, not missing a single feather. The struggles to shoot the birds continued in the following days but, despite unloading hundreds of bullets, less than a dozen emus were killed.

As reports suggest, by November 9th, almost a week after the first engagement, some 2,500 rounds of ammunition had been fired, but the number of killed birds remained uncertain. One account suggested it was just 50 birds, and another account estimated in-between 200 and 500 birds. No human casualties, though.

As the emus continually managed to outwit their opponents, Meredith and his men were defeated and retreated to Canberra. That meant and end to the Great Emu War, because when the farmers insisted on more military assistance on the matter, the government refused.

The emus had won.

Emus have three toes on each foot, which is their greatest asset in helping them run fast. Author: FunkMonk / CC-BY 3.0

According to Meredith, who provided a statement to a local paper “they could face machine guns with the invulnerability of tanks.”

More proposals for a war on the emu were to follow not only in the next year, but also in 1943 and 1948. Thankfully, all these proposals were turned down, and other solutions were sought to fix the problems that did not involve mass killings of the birds.

Today, the indigenous bird of Australia is a part of the country’s coat of arms.

‘Death Island’: Britain’s ‘concentration camp’ in Russia

‘Death Island’: Britain’s ‘concentration camp’ in Russia

Marina Titova lays a carnation on a grave stone on Mudyug IslandImage copyright ALEKSEY SUHANOVSKYImage caption Marina Titova lays a carnation in memory of her great-great-uncle who died on Mudyug

When British soldiers were sent to Russia after the Russian Revolution their main enemies were the Germans – their opponents in World War One – but they also found themselves fighting and imprisoning Bolsheviks. In the process they opened what Russians regard as…

View On WordPress

‘Death Island’: Britain’s ‘concentration camp’ in Russia

Marina Titova lays a carnation on a grave stone on Mudyug IslandImage copyright ALEKSEY SUHANOVSKY
Image caption Marina Titova lays a carnation in memory of her great-great-uncle who died on Mudyug

When British soldiers were sent to Russia after the Russian Revolution their main enemies were the Germans – their opponents in World War One – but they also found themselves fighting and imprisoning Bolsheviks. In the process they opened what Russians regard as the first concentration camp in their country.

The boat sails down the River Dvina past onion-domed churches, lumber yards and logs floating in the water. Finally it reaches the open sea and an hour later a brown smudge appears on the horizon.

Getting closer, I can make out a lighthouse and a few radio towers. As my companions and I jump off the boat and walk along a deserted beach a pack of dogs surrounds us, barking furiously. They are not used to visitors. The only people who live on this remote spot today are border guards and a couple of meteorologists.

A dilapidated watchtower and barbed wire on Mudyug islandImage copyright KIRILL IODAS

Back in the Soviet era, boatloads of day trippers came to the island of Mudyug to visit a museum. It was located among the remains of a prison camp – one very different from the scores of old Gulag outposts scattered across the Russian north and Siberia. For one thing, it was set up as far back as 1918. Even more remarkably, the people in charge were were British and French.

My colleague Natalia Golysheva, who grew up in the regional capital, Arkhangelsk – Archangel as it used to be known in English – says the place had a fearsome reputation. Locals called it Death Island.

“When I was little, people said if you don’t behave, the Whites will come and take you to Mudyug,” she says. “I didn’t understand but when I tried to ask questions – ‘What is Mudyug? Who are the Whites?’ – my grandmother just said shush and turned her face away, meaning the conversation was over.”

Map showing south of Mudyug Island with locator

The Whites were the anti-Bolshevik forces that emerged after the October Revolution in 1917. They got the name from the cream-coloured uniforms worn by higher ranks in the Tsarist army. Some were reactionary military officers who wanted to bring back the monarchy, others were moderate socialists, reformers, tradesmen, fishermen or peasants.

When the Bolsheviks seized power in the autumn of 1917, Russia was still fighting in World War One, allied with Britain, France and the US against the Central Powers of Germany and Austria-Hungary and their Ottoman allies.

However, Lenin had come to power promising supporters not only bread to eat and a share of the aristocrats’ land, but also peace. When he signed a peace treaty with Germany, Western governments acted rapidly to re-open this eastern front.

Troops lining up in ArkhangelskImage copyright    LORD IRONSIDE
Image caption   British and French troops lining up in Arkhangelsk in 1919

Within months, tens of thousands of soldiers from Britain, the United States, France, Canada, Australia and other countries were ordered to Russia in what became known as the Allied Intervention. Some went to the south and far east of Russia and 14,000 troops under British command were sent to Arkhangelsk, near the Arctic Circle. The men were told their mission was to protect military stores and stop Germany from establishing a submarine base.

But the foreign troops also took the side of the Whites in Russia’s nascent Civil War. Some European politicians, such as Winston Churchill, worried about Communism spreading across Europe.

Soon after the Allies docked in Arkhangelsk on 2 August 1918, they began locking people up. “They didn’t know who to trust or the difference between the Reds and Whites – so they decided to incarcerate anyone who seemed suspect,” says Liudmila Novikova, a Moscow-based historian who has become an expert on the post-revolutionary period in the Russian north.

Since the main prison in the town was overcrowded, potential troublemakers were shipped to the island of Mudyug, 70km (45 miles) away. The first batch of inmates had to build their own prison camp in this desolate, windswept place.

Bolshevik prisoners lined up in the prison camp on Mudyug islandImage copyright   LIBRARY OF CONGRESS
Image caption    Bolshevik prisoners in the prison camp on Mudyug island

We walk along the beach past a rickety watchtower before taking a path through a pine forest. It leads to some wooden barracks with rusty barbed wire on the windows.

The door opens with a creak and we are inside a long dormitory with hundreds of beds, divided by panels of wood. Each seems as narrow as a coffin.

Marina Titova, a young museum guide from Arkhangelsk who has joined us on the trip, sits on one of the beds, lost in thought.

A dormitory where some of the prisoners would have slept 100 years agoImage copyright    KIRILL IODAS

Her great-great-uncle Fyodor Oparin, a roofer, had been at the front fighting the Germans in World War One. He was only briefly reunited with his wife and small daughter before he was arrested and sent to Mudyug, accused of recruiting the men in his village into the Red Army.

With few washing facilities and no change of clothes, inmates soon became infested with lice. Typhus spread like wildfire. Overall, about 1,000 people were imprisoned here and up to 300 died – either as a result of disease, or because they were shot or tortured to death.

When we visit it is a muggy summer afternoon and the air is thick with midges. I dread to think what it would be like here during an Arctic winter when temperatures can reach -30C (-22F). Signs from the now abandoned museum point out the “ice cells”, left open to the elements, where rebellious prisoners were punished and either perished or lost limbs to frostbite.

Pavel Rasskazov, a radical journalist, spent several months on Mudyug. In his Prison Memoirs, which became a well-known and much-studied text in the Soviet era, he documented the appalling conditions and the lack of food.

He describes how, when dried bread was distributed in the morning, “starving, angry men with greedy eyes crawled all over the filthy, damp floor, full of spit, picking up each and every crumb”.

Rasskazov managed to survive this place, unlike Marina’s relative, Fyodor Oparin. According to one account, he tried to escape but was too weak to move fast and was shot as he ran. In another version of events, he was caught and executed the following day, along with 13 other prisoners.

Fyodor Oparin with his wife, MarinaImage copyright    MARINA TITOVA
Image caption    Fyodor Oparin with his wife, Marina

Under some fir trees Marina has found a commemorative plaque to the men killed trying to escape. As she places two red carnations on the crumbling stone, a cloud of mist swirls through the trees and a soft rain falls.

“Perhaps it was just a coincidence,” she says later. “But it seemed like a greeting from the past, and maybe those prisoners who suffered here, who tried to survive, could see that they were being remembered.”

In Soviet times these men were remembered more often. On a small hill by the camp, there is a 25m-high obelisk adorned with a red star and hammer and sickle. Some chunks of granite have fallen off but you can still read the inscription which says it was built “in honour of patriots tortured to death by the Interventionists”.

A memorial that reads: 'Glory to the patriots tortured by the intervention forces on the island of Mudyug'Image copyright   KIRILL IODAS

“This monument could be seen by all the ships sailing past,” says historian Liudmila Novikova. “Foreign sailors who came to Arkhangelsk were often taken to Mudyug to remind them of all the atrocities their fellow countrymen and governments committed here.”

Schoolchildren and factory workers also came on visits.

Near the monument, we find a run-down hall with dusty glass cases, peeling red posters on the walls and photographs of the “martyrs who gave their lives for the Revolution” or died here on the island, which is described in the inscriptions as a concentration camp.

Boatloads of day-trippers once came to MudyugImage copyright   KIRILL IODAS

There are pictures of Gen Edmund Ironside, the British commander of all the Allied troops in the region. Novikova says he would have known what was happening on the island even if he never visited.

This is confirmed by an entry in the leather-bound notebooks he kept in Russia, now in the possession of his 93-year-old son.

“Scurvy seems to be beginning among the Russian prisoners on Mudyug Island… and as it is a difficult place to get to, rations have been pinched,” the general writes.

Gen Ironside's diary

If the British established the camp and some of those in charge were French, many guards seem to have been local men. “We cannot have a scandalous camp,” he writes. “I am responsible that the Russians treat their people well. I am always after them over the state of the prison.”

But Novikova says improving conditions on Mudyug was hardly a priority for Ironside. “For him it was just a necessary security measure, and after all people were fighting and dying every day on all the fronts. So if prisoners in the rear were dying from bad conditions, that was just a drop in the ocean of suffering here.”

The treatment of prisoners on Mudyug horrified one man who would later play a devastating role in northern Russia. A prominent Bolshevik close to Lenin, Mikhail Kedrov, was sent to Arkhangelsk after the October revolution and later became became a fanatical regional head of the Cheka – the secret police.

Alexander Orlov, a fellow Chekist who later defected to Canada, recalls Kedrov as a tall handsome man with ragged black hair. He writes that his eyes were often “gleaming like burning coal… possibly these were the sparks of madness”.

Russian teenagers on a visit to Mudyug island during the Soviet eraImage copyright   LIBRARY OF CONGRESS
Citizens were encouraged to visit Mudyug island during the Soviet eraImage copyright    LIBRARY OF CONGRESS
Image caption     Soviet citizens were encouraged to visit the Mudyug prison camp

While the Red Terror was not mentioned in the USSR for decades, the crimes of the White forces were endlessly listed in official propaganda. Atrocities were committed on both sides, says historian Liudmila Novikova, but the scale was different.

“The Whites and Allies who supported them were mainly pragmatic. They wanted to kill those who undermined their effort, troops who rebelled or members of the Bolshevik underground – they didn’t care about eliminating their enemies totally. It was quite different on Red side because they were waging a war against the old regime – the bourgeoisie, Tsarist officers and whole classes were perceived as enemies who had to be liquidated,” she says.

Find out more

Prisoners endured freezing conditions on Mudyug islandImage copyright  KIRILL IODAS

 Mikhail Kedrov set up a number of death camps in the North, including the first one of its kind, in Kholmogory, an hour’s drive from Arkhangelsk.

Somewhere between 3,000 and 8,000 people were imprisoned and killed at a 17th Century convent. Many were White Army officers and sailors from the Kronstadt naval fortress near Finland who had rebelled against the Bolsheviks. But others had nothing to do with the military. Some were clergy, some were ordinary people who for some reason had been labelled “counter-revolutionaries”.

At Kholmogory, where much of the convent is now held up by scaffolding and wrapped in corrugated iron, I met Elena, a parishioner who sings in the convent choir. She says people in the area sometimes find skulls when they dig pits to store potatoes over the winter.

Elena says the priest and volunteers collected some human remains in sacks and buried them under a marble cross on one side of the Cathedral of the Transfiguration. Each year they sing a requiem for those who died.

It’s hard to pinpoint but there is an oppressive atmosphere which clings to this place, like the cold to the refectory walls when Elena invites us inside for a cup of tea.

Locals use the path through the garden as a shortcut across the town but Elena says few know – or care – about Kholmogory’s terrible history.

Does she believe the Allied Intervention was the catalyst for Russia’s devastating civil war, as Lenin and others have often claimed?

“I remember in my childhood hearing stories from my granny,” she says. “I was a Young Pioneer and I told her the Reds were good and the Whites were bad and the Intervention troops were bad. And my granny said ‘What are you talking about? The English came to our village, they brought us white flour, they gave the children sweets.’ And I said: ‘Granny – that is impossible they are our enemies!'”

Elena shakes her head. “They were not our enemies and to say they were responsible for the civil war is wrong. Of course not! We had enough of our own scoundrels without the intervention troops.”