When engineer Lukasz Cejrowski finally saw the world’s largest wind turbine blades installed on a prototype tower in 2016, he stood in front of it and took a selfie. Obviously.
“It was amazing,” he says, recalling the moment with a laugh. “The feeling of happiness – ‘Yes, it works, it’s mounted.'”
Those blades, made by Danish firm LM Wind Power, were a record-breaking 88.4m (290ft) long – bigger than the wingspan of an Airbus A380, or nearly the length of two Olympic-sized swimming pools. The swept area of such a mammoth rotor blade would cover Rome’s Colosseum.
But things move quickly in the wind turbine industry.
In just a few years, those blades could be surpassed by the company’s next project – 107m-long blades.
LM Wind Power is owned by global engineering firm General Electric (GE), which announced in March that it hopes to develop a giant 12MW (megawatt) wind turbine by the year 2020.
A single turbine this size, standing 260m tall, could produce enough electricity to power 16,000 households.
The world’s current largest wind turbine is a third less powerful than that, generating 8MW. Various companies, including Siemens, are working on turbines around the 10MW mark.
When it comes to wind turbines, it seems, size matters.
This is because bigger turbines capture more wind energy and do so at greater altitudes, where wind production is more consistent.
But designing and manufacturing blades of this size is a significant feat of engineering.
Mr Cejrowski says that the firm could in theory use metal, but the blades would be extremely expensive and heavy. Instead, they use a mix of carbon and glass fibre.
First, they make a glass-fibre and polyester shell for each blade – in two halves. Then the spar cap is added. That’s a length of reinforcing material that runs down the inside of each of these halves.
For this, Mr Cejrowski’s team uses a glass-carbon composite fabric, infused with a special resin that hardens in place.
These ultra-large blades are extensively tested. Prototypes are bent, stretched, buffeted in wind tunnels and, during “fatigue tests”, flexed back and forth quickly millions of times to simulate a lifetime of use. They’re also tested against lightning strike.
The world’s biggest wind turbines are generally installed offshore rather than on land. That way, they avoid being gigantic eyesores in our midst and are able to harness the powerful winds out at sea.
The potential of offshore wind has prompted some to draw up plans for future windfarms on an enormous scale, in waters many miles from land.
US researchers recently showed that a huge amount of untapped energy could be harnessed by building a giant windfarm in the North Atlantic.
Separately, Dutch firm TenneT has developed a concept for a very large windfarm that could be built at Dogger Bank, an area of shallow water in the North Sea.
It would include a man-made island where substations could be located and, with many hundreds of turbines, supply power to countries including the UK, the Netherlands, Germany, Denmark and Sweden.
In total, it could have a capacity of some 30GW (gigawatts), the company says.
To put that in context, the average electricity demand for the whole of the UK is 36GW.
Henrik Stiesdal, a former chief engineer at Siemens’ wind power division who now works at Danish Technical University, says there are numerous advantages to building supersized offshore farms like this – even cosmetic benefits.
“If you’re more than 40km (25 miles) out, the curvature of the earth means the turbines will be below the horizon,” he says.
Mr Stiesdal says various organisations, including his own institution and the University of Oxford, are working on ways to make offshore wind turbine foundations cheaper.
One idea is to develop floating platforms that would be cheaper to manufacture in large quantities in factories.
But if the cost of foundations does come down, it could then be cost-effective to install larger numbers of smaller turbines rather than fewer big ones.
“The chasing of the big machines will continue only as long as the infrastructure costs are high,” he explains.
For this reason, wind turbines are unlikely to exceed the 12MW models, he believes.
One downside of building offshore windfarms with many smaller turbines, though, is that there are many more individual bits of equipment needing to be serviced and maintained out at sea, where the conditions can often be inhospitable, to say the least.
For the more immediate future, expect to see offshore wind farms continue to multiply, especially in Europe, says Joel Meggelaars at industry association Wind Europe.
“GE is definitely the biggest announcement that we’ve seen so far,” he says, referring to the planned 12MW turbine.
Wind supplied more than 11% of Europe’s electricity in the first half of 2017, Wind Europe says.
And Mr Meggelaars expects that percentage to grow, as more windfarms are installed.
“In 2019, we expect to see another record of offshore wind being installed, around 4GW – again, most of that is in the UK and Germany.”
The main hurdle for potential projects such as Dogger Bank, he adds, is governments having to co-operate with one another. It may be decades before a windfarm like that gets going.
In the meantime, one initial benefit of increasingly large turbines is the falling cost of wind power, says Mr Meggelaars.
“It’s absolutely great news that these bigger turbines are on the horizon,” he explains. “It will make renewables even cheaper.”